19 Nov 2010, 12:41pm
Politics and politicians
by admin

Oregon State Budget $5 Billion In the Hole

Note: the following is excerpted from a longer letter.

Oregon’s December Forecast & Charting A New Course

From OR State Rep. Richardson’s Newsletter, November 19, 2010

I am State Representative Dennis Richardson and I write this newsletter for Oregonians interested in what can be done to make Oregon a better place to live and work. This edition focuses on two subjects, the breaking news on Oregon’s revenue, and the message Oregon voters recently sent to the Legislators.

Today, the Oregon’s State Economist released the Quarterly Revenue Forecast that showed a “smoke and mirrors” increase in 2009-11 revenue. In reality, a reduction of $40 Million would normally have been disclosed for the remaining seven months of this biennium.

Unknown to most of us, the Oregon Dept. of Revenue recently announced an increase in the percentage of State payroll withholdings beginning Jan. 1, 2011. Although the increase in payroll deductions apply to the 2011 tax year, the withholdings from January 1 – June 30, 2010, will appear on the State’s balance sheet as current budget revenue, even though much of it will be returned to the wage-earners after their 2011 tax returns are filed. In other words, today’s forecast artificially shows an increase in 2009-11 State revenue of $61.9 million, when the actual revenue expectations, without the artificial bump-up in withholding, would have shown a $40 million decrease in 2009-11 revenue since the Sept. 2010 Forecast. …

The actual $40 million decrease in State revenue is the tenth consecutive reduction in revenue estimates. Since the close the 2009 Legislative Session, Oregon’s anticipated revenue has fallen by 1.3 billion. …

The size, duration and extent of Oregon’s economic recession have placed all Oregonians in a precarious financial situation. To balance the current 2009-11 State Budget required cobbling together $1.6 billion in one-time money—primarily composed of federal stimulus money, state savings accounts and agencies’ ending fund balances. In addition to replacing the $1.6 billion needed to balance the current budget, in 2011-13 an additional $2.2 billion will be needed to maintain Oregon’s current service level “CSL” for the next two-years. Thus, assuming Oregon’s revenue remains constant, $3.8 billion in additional revenue would be needed to balance the next budget.

Unfortunately, Oregon’s revenues have not remained constant. In fact, Oregon’s revenues remain in free-fall. In a previous newsletter I explained the August 2010 Revenue Forecast disclosed that Oregon’s expected revenues had dropped more than $1.3 Billion since the 2009 legislative session ended. Today’s news confirmed that assessment.

The significance of a $1.3 billion decrease in State revenue is stunning. In addition to the $3.8 billion discussed above, that would have been needed if revenues had been stable, an additional $1.3 billion will be needed to compensate for recent losses in anticipated state revenues. Thus, Oregon now faces a $5.1 billion shortfall going into the 2011 legislative session, unless there is a dramatic and immediate economic recovery.

Spending freezes and across-the-board cuts will not fill a $5 billion hole. The state simply cannot resolve a $5 billion shortfall without major structural reforms in both what services are provided and how they are provided. …

21 Nov 2010, 11:40am
by bear bait


Hmmm. The electoral majority is liberal, and led by public employee unions, mandatory union dues collected from every public employee, whether they deign to join a union or not. They still pay. And the preponderance of that money goes to fund political goals and gains designed to benefit public employees, above all.

The present and past public employees all have a stake in the state’s revenue and their own well being. State’s revenue determines their pay, their benefits, and their retirement. With short work lives, we have ended up with a public employment situation in which private side employees actually are working two public employee work years for every one the public employee works. This full Wally retirement in your late 40’s for Federal workers, and early 50s for state and local workers, means that for every working day of their life, we now have to support them at the same pay level in retirement for as long as they worked and longer. It is schedule doomed to failure and bankruptcy for the public sector. It is unsustainable. Add to that the expected 8% annual compounded growth of Tier 1 retirements, the ability for part time workers to get a full time job that lasts three years that will give them full time worker retirements (you see, annually, legislators moving from the legislature to an agency job at close to a six figure income, and that in three years will give them a state retirement benefit of more than they ever make working, from retirement to death.)

Oregon has to fix a problem, without a consensus to fix it. Add to that Mr. Veto, our new retread governor, and you do know that nothing, absolutely nothing, will come of this legislative session in 2011, and the ones to be held annually after. The influence and votes of those who are publicly employed are in the majority. It is their votes, the votes of the retired public employees, and their families, and all those who think that their lot in life is better when governments are handing out money and services that they really ought to be paying for themselves. But they can’t. Their low wage jobs won’t allow for that. But you cannot get high wage jobs to locate in a nanny state that wants to tax, tax, and tax some more. And then won’t allow natural resource business, and is saddled with over half the land in Federal hands, and not producing income. In fact, the lack of budget attention, and constant litigation has rendered the public lands to caretaker status, and the caretaker has no interest in paying the caretaker a decent wage, nor will it invest in infrastructure that will keep the present one intact. The whole of their budge is dedicated to tearing out things. Asset destruction.

I make it sound like economic recovery in Oregon is going to be tough, but I am understating the case. Under current national and state leadership, it is impossible.

The new jobs in the world go to the young who will work cheap. And the jobs lost in the world are those that involve older workers who come with expensive health and welfare, pension baggage, and high wages. Over 50, lose your job, and you are toast… done… through. Fries with that? Your job has fled to Asia. Or the other Americas. No matter, it is gone, never to return. Your government spending, and the cradle-to-grave entitlements were unsustainable, but politically supported, and the Feds borrowed to pay your cost. Now we pay $0.48 out of every dollar of Federal revenue on INTEREST ONLY on our debt. And then we do entitlements, like SSI, Medicaid, and Medicare, and we have $0.13 left to pay all the bills for defense, land management and caretaking, public roads, airports, seaways, and farm support. And that is not enough money so we borrow more. We be wipin’ our ass on a hoop and lookin’ for a place to grab it for the next round. No way, now, not to get you hands shitty.

Thank you, politicians. Our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren thank you. I do hope you rot in hell.

21 Nov 2010, 12:22pm
by Mike


The interesting thing is that there is no way under the sun that Oregon’s bled-dry taxpayers can come up with $5 billion out of thin air. We don’t print money. If the Feds don’t bail us out, we are sunk.

Ditto CA, WA, and many of (all?) the other states. The only option is for the Feds to “monetize the debt”, which means print more fiat currency. That will cause runaway inflation, which appears to be inevitable no matter what.

But time has run out. It is unlikely Congress will act soon enough to prevent shutdown of Oregon’s state government and lay off of 90% of the state employees. The school system will collapse. No money to pay the teachers or, by extension, the teachers’ union.

Ta ta, P.E.’s. And don’t bother trying to collect unemployment. That well is dry, too.

22 Nov 2010, 1:00pm
by bear bait


The all state and local government PERS make up due to investments not producing is $1.1 Billion for the biennium. That is just hole filling. The investment gains are distributed immediately to pensioners, and any losses are made up by taxpayers. Heads they win. Tails we lose. Playground economics at work in Oregon.

The State Board of Forestry is interested in “stakeholder” opinion on the direction of State forest policy. That policy is so restrictive and micro managed now that diversity in industrial forestry is a joke. It is clear by age 40, Oust based herbicide and pile burning, and planting. No viable grass, forb or brush growth on the clear cut as it will oversprayed once after planting if there is a brush and grass regrowth threat. No real habitat in the reprod until maybe age 7 or 8. And then it is gone in 4 years max. And the monoculture of doug fir arises phoenix like from the clear cut, on its way to a fast and early clear cut interruption of the capitalization schedule. It is not the FPA now running that show. It is investor expectations over the three and four decades from one clear cut cycle to the next.

So, the effective truth of forest policy and regulation is that we have a perpetual juvenile stand of monocultural trees intensively managed because of investor expectations, and the reality of invested money needing to make an early and needed profit.

Most industrial forest land is tied one way or another to a conversion facility, a mill complex. But that 40% or more of Oregon private timber land that is noted as “small woodlands” is not connected in anyway to a milling facility, and logs from that land is opportunistic in that logs are only produced when the owner sees a favorable market, which does little to fund Oregon governments in times of economic distress. Those are the times when public timber should be cut and used to create jobs and cash flow for government. That is now a joke of vast possibility unrealized. Boom or bust by the demographics of land ownership. Certain bust in public timber appraised to standards with little fealty to the current market, and certain failure of availability of small woodlands timber due to distrust and depressed prices. So the dependable standard is the industrial timberlands that are managed like a carrot farm. Plant, spray, thin, harvest, spray, plant, spray, thin, harvest until urban needs claim the land for housing or “open space.”

Someone should post a map of Oregon in Wikipedia under the definition of “tits up.” And that we be. A floater in the river of ruin by those who think someone else should pay for their dinner. Done: as put a fork in it. Oregon: the state that falls of its bone. Put a fork in it. Oregon is done. There are now more tax dependents than there are tax originators. More people paying taxes on income that all comes from taxes and fees. Wipe your fanny on a hoop money. The law of diminishing returns. Over cropping, and depleted top soil of taxable money.

*name

*e-mail

web site

leave a comment


 
  • Colloquia

  • Commentary and News

  • Contact

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Meta