24 Mar 2010, 9:59am
Federal forest policy Politics and politicians
by admin

California Calls for USFS Management Changes to Prevent Wildfire

by Larry H.

A California state senator has introduced a resolution calling for the USFS to “change management structure.”

BILL NUMBER: SCR 75 [here]
INTRODUCED BY Senator Hollingsworth
FEBRUARY 18, 2010

This measure would declare that there is an ongoing emergency due to the threat of wildfire, call on the federal government to take immediate measures to prevent imminent catastrophic wildfires, and request Governor Schwarzenegger to advocate at the federal level for the United States Forest Service to undertake prevention and maintenance work in the state’s federal forest lands and to encourage a change in management structure in the United States Forest Service to coordinate decisionmaking authority over state project decisions inside the state.

Lots of very interesting “whereas” clauses are included in this bill. Example:

WHEREAS, Insurance losses for each fire season run into the billions of dollars, and insurers have paid out in excess of eight billion dollars ($8,000,000,000) to thousands of policy holders from just the top 10 state wildfires since 1970;

And a “resolved” cause to change the structure of the USFS:

Resolved, That the Legislature, together with the state’s local governments, requests that Governor Schwarzenegger advocate at the federal level for the United States Forest Service to undertake prevention and maintenance work in the state’s federal forest lands, and to encourage a change in management structure in the United States Forest Service to coordinate decisionmaking authority over
state project decisions inside the state;

California Sen. Holligsworth is evidently fed up with his state being a burn zone for the Feds. He’d rather not incur any more disastrous wildfires due to Federal incompetence. He’d prefer that the USFS figure out how NOT to promulgate any more megafires because the cost-plus-loss to California is outrageous.

The entire Resolution:

SCR 75 (Hollingsworth)
Wildfires: United States Forest Service

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

SCR 75, as introduced, Hollingsworth. Wildfires: United States Forest Service.

This measure would declare that there is an ongoing emergency due to the threat of wildfire, call on the federal government to take immediate measures to prevent imminent catastrophic wildfires, and request Governor Schwarzenegger to advocate at the federal level for the United States Forest Service to undertake prevention and maintenance work in the state’s federal forest lands and to encourage a change in management structure in the United States Forest Service to coordinate decisionmaking authority over state project decisions inside the state.

WHEREAS, Catastrophic wildfires continue to threaten lives, property, and the natural resources of the state; and

WHEREAS, Insurance losses for each fire season run into the billions of dollars, and insurers have paid out in excess of eight billion dollars ($8,000,000,000) to thousands of policy holders from just the top 10 state wildfires since 1970; and

WHEREAS, State wildfires cause employment losses in the hundreds of millions of dollars; and

WHEREAS, The increase of catastrophic wildfires in the state has resulted in harmful secondary environmental effects, including diminished air and water quality, impacted watersheds, increased greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutant emissions, and threatened habitats of sensitive wildlife species; and

WHEREAS, Approximately 80 percent of the state’s developed surface water supply originates on watershed lands within rural counties and near federal lands. The state’s residents utilize this water for domestic, commercial, agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other beneficial uses. These rivers, lakes, and watershed lands also serve as habitat for hundreds of species of fish and wildlife; and

WHEREAS, The state is comprised of approximately 50 percent publicly owned land and 50 percent privately owned land, but many rural counties have substantially higher percentages of publicly owned land, some as much as 98 percent; and

WHEREAS, There are over 43,000,000 acres of federal land in the state, much of which has not been adequately managed to mitigate the risk of catastrophic wildfire; and

WHEREAS, Two of the three largest wildfires in the state in the past 100 years began on federally owned land; and

WHEREAS, Millions of dollars are spent each year fighting fires in our national forests; and

WHEREAS, The United States Forest Service spent over one billion two hundred seventy million dollars ($1,270,000,000) on fire suppression in 2008, which exceeded 50 percent of the 2008 wildland fire budget; and

WHEREAS, The escalating costs of fighting fires on United States Forest Service land over the last 10 years has significantly diminished the available resources for the critically needed prevention measures that could minimize these catastrophic fires; and

WHEREAS, The state has made significant strides towards reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfires on state and private lands, including ranking lands as to the level of fire hazard, requiring 100 feet of defensible space around homes, requiring ignition-resistant materials on all new construction that is built in a fire hazard severity zone within a state responsibility area, a local agency very high fire hazard severity zone, or a designated wildland-urban interface (WUI) fire area, and many other things to not only address preservation of life and property but mitigate the environmental damage of large scale wildfire as well; and

WHEREAS, Even with these positive mitigation efforts made by the state, there continues to be an extreme risk of catastrophic wildfires in the state and throughout the West due to unnaturally heavy fuel loads and the early drying of wildland vegetation; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, the Assembly thereof concurring, That the Legislature of the State of California declares that there is an ongoing emergency due to the threat of wildfire; and be it further

Resolved, That the Legislature calls on the federal government to take immediate measures to prevent imminent catastrophic wildfires; and be it further

Resolved, That the Legislature, together with the state’s local governments, requests that Governor Schwarzenegger advocate at the federal level for the United States Forest Service to undertake prevention and maintenance work in the state’s federal forest lands, and to encourage a change in management structure in the United States Forest Service to coordinate decisionmaking authority over state project decisions inside the state; and be it further

Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the Governor and to the author for appropriate distribution.

24 Mar 2010, 10:59am
by Bob Zybach


Good luck, Senator Hollingsworth!

25 Mar 2010, 11:34am
by Forrest Grump


This is a good start. I guess in rural California, the frustration is more acute than it is in states with saner politics.
No chance it will happen in CA, but the issue is breached now, and that’s a good thing.

25 Mar 2010, 3:18pm
by YPmule


Posted to the YPTimes.

26 Mar 2010, 9:07am
by bear bait


You would think the dope growers would want the USFS to do more to extinguish fires. They are concerned enough about legalization demeaning their illegal grows, and compromising the underground market quality and supply by MegaAg pricing and Walmart sourcing. One would suppose the Chinese would undercut the market, and lace the dope with pesticides that would make inhaling the dope smoke unhealthy….yep. Gotta keep that smoke healthy you inhale smoking dope.

So after reading about the concerns of the illegal dope growers in Humboldt County, I free associated into Afghanistan and started to giggle about pulling poppy fields while Northern California dope growers were worrying about their dope being legalized. So how tough would it be to legalize poppy growing in Afghanistan, and take the bottom out of the market to where it paid just as well to raise barley or wheat??? Of course, they don’t have the forest fire threat we do here. Legalized pot, and then would there be an interesting tort claim for a WFU that ran onto private land and burned up a multi million dollar pot crop….There is nothing boring about our world, is there?

26 Mar 2010, 9:54am
by Mike


The mindset of the dopers is anti-management, anti-helicopter. They desperately wish to keep all USFS personnel (and everybody else for that matter) OFF the public land, for fear their plantations will be discovered.

That mindset has helped fuel fires. The doper set and the eco-litigation set are the SAME people. They sue to prevent active management, regardless of the wildfire consequences, because de-humanizing the landscape allows more illegal activity out there.

We’re not talking about deep-thinkers or socially responsible folks. The dopers are self-inflicted stupid.

*name

*e-mail

web site

leave a comment


 
  • Colloquia

  • Commentary and News

  • Contact

  • Follow me on Twitter

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Meta