Washington land grab unwelcome in the West
“Pursuing the strategy outlined in the released documents would threaten western livelihoods.”
Little Chicago Review, Mar 03 2010 [here]
WASHINGTON, DC – On Tuesday, Senate Western Caucus (SWC) Chairman John Barrasso and caucus members sent a letter to Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar in opposition to a recently released document from the Department of the Interior (DOI) detailing a strategy to overhaul public and private lands in the West.
The leaked DOI document outlines a strategy to use the Antiquities Act to enact presidential designations of 17 National Monuments in Utah, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, California, Arizona, Oregon, Colorado, Wyoming, Alaska and Washington, and to acquire approximately $4 billion of private land in Nevada, California, Utah, Colorado, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and Oregon.
The SWC letter calls on Secretary Salazar to abandon one-size-fits-all policies for lands in the West.
The text of the letter follows:
Dear Secretary Salazar;
As members of the Senate Western Caucus, we write in opposition to a recently released document from the Department of the Interior detailing a strategy to overhaul public and private lands in the West. The document outlines plans for presidential monument designations and land acquisition in 12 western states. Implementing this strategy would break trust with the people of the West.
Americans enjoy a variety of benefits from our public lands, but many westerners rely on public lands for their very livelihoods. For that reason, Congress has ensured that public land management decisions are made in a process that is both public and transparent. Pursuing the strategy outlined in the released documents would threaten western livelihoods and violate the multiple use management framework that is relied upon in western communities. Americans should never live in fear that the stroke of a pen in Washington could forever change their lives.
Land management is most successful when built from local consensus and stakeholder involvement. Grassroots conservation efforts are succeeding in communities across the West. In contrast, top-down land management directives from Washington are recipes for failure. Presidential designations often engender local strife and a loss of public trust. Conflicts over jurisdiction and private property rights continue to plague national monuments designated by the Clinton Administration. Embracing these failed methods would foster resentment in western communities and eliminate the potential for collaborative conservation efforts.
Expansion of federal land holdings and authority is an unsustainable policy. The bureaus of the Department of the Interior are already overloaded with acreage and responsibility. The Bureau of Land Management faces budget shortfalls annually, and the National Park Service faces a maintenance backlog on its existing facilities of over 9 billion dollars. Policy makers must focus on making responsible investments on behalf of the American taxpayer. With that priority in mind, there is no basis for expanding acreage and creating new management requirements for federal land across the West.
The Senate Western Caucus opposes the recently released Department of the Interior strategy for land designation and acquisition. Unilateral action will not be successful in the West. Western communities have a long, successful history of land stewardship. We urge the Department to defer to local land use decision-making and grassroots conservation efforts.
The following Republican senators participated in the letter:
John Barrasso (Wyoming)
Orrin Hatch (Utah)
Senator Jon Kyl (Arizona)
Senator Mike Enzi (Wyoming)
Senator Bob Bennett (Utah)
Senator John Ensign (Nevada)
Senator Mike Johanns (Nevada)